May 11, 2010
Leibniz + Adams = Calvinist Theodicy
As I have said before, it is my belief that revealed theology cannot resolve the Calvinist-Arminian debate. Both views (at least in their moderate forms) are both plausible and orthodox; any reason to prefer one to the other will be a philosophical reason, a conclusion of fallible human reason. With this understanding of revealed theology in mind, I reject Calvinism on philosophical grounds, one of which is that I think Calvinism has an extremely difficult time with the problem of evil. In a recent post, The Problem of Evil 101, at Reason From Scripture, Nathanael Taylor presents a 'Reformed' response...
Continue reading "Leibniz + Adams = Calvinist Theodicy"
February 3, 2010
Soteriological Inclusivism
Jeremy has an interesting discussion of soteriological inclusivism up on his blog. He argues, without necessarily endorsing inclusivism, that this view can be best accommodated by a Calvinist understanding of salvation. I want here to first clarify how we should understand inclusivism and why we should take it seriously, and then challenge the assumption that Calvinism is the best way to accommodate the view within a Christian framework. Soteriological inclusivism, as I understand it, is an attempt to endorse both of the following claims: (1) There is only one way of salvation. (2) Some who do not explicitly/consciously/intentionally follow this...
Continue reading "Soteriological Inclusivism"
October 2, 2009
Quote of the Day: Leibniz Against Hyper-Calvinism
If there are people who believe that election and reprobation are accomplished on God's part by a despotic and absolute power, not only without any apparent reason but actually without any reason, even a concealed one, they maintain an opinion that destroys alike the nature of things and the divine perfections. Such an absolutely absolute decree (so to speak) would be without doubt insupportable. But Luther and Calvin were far from such a belief: the former hopes that the life to come will make us comprehend the just reasons of God's choice; and the latter protests explicitly that these reasons...
Continue reading "Quote of the Day: Leibniz Against Hyper-Calvinism"
October 8, 2008
Baber on the Real Presence
Some of the papers to be presented at the
Society of Christian Philosophers, Pacific Division Conference have now been
posted. Mine isn't up yet, but I will provide a link when it is. For now, I want to point readers to a paper by
the University of San Diego's Harriet Baber which she has entitled simply
"The Real Presence". We have previously discussed here
the difference between transubstantiation and real presence. Baber describes this quite nicely in her introduction...
Continue reading "Baber on the Real Presence"
Topic(s):
Church Dogmatics
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Harriet Baber
,
Historical Thinkers
,
Huldrych Zwingli
,
John Calvin
,
Metaphysics
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Protestantism
,
Roman Catholic Church
,
The Church
,
The Eucharist
,
Theology
,
Thomas Aquinas
Posted by
Kenny at
12:34 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (0)