July 27, 2004

This Post is Old!

The post you are reading is years old and may not represent my current views. I started blogging around the time I first began to study philosophy, age 17. In my view, the point of philosophy is to expose our beliefs to rational scrutiny so we can revise them and get better beliefs that are more likely to be true. That's what I've been up to all these years, and this blog has been part of that process. For my latest thoughts, please see the front page.

"A Philosophical Discussion of the Christian Doctrines of the Fall of Man and the Regeneration of the Holy Spirit"

I've just posted a new paper to my writings section. The name of the paper is "A Philosophical Discussion of the Christian Doctrines of the Fall of Man and the Regeneration of the Holy Spirit". This is a first first first draft (not yet seen by anyone but me) so any input would be much appreciated and can be posted here or e-mailed to me. That goes for any kind of feedback, whether on form or content. As before, I'll post my responses here and if I alter the paper in any way I will make note of that here. Check it out here (PDF format).

Major influences of this paper: The basic idea that all human desires are basically good and implanted by God but have been twisted onto improper targets as a result of the Fall has probably been around for a while, but I got it from John Eldredge. I have read and highly reccomend his Wild at Heart and Waking the Dead. He has also written at least two other books I have not read, The Journey of Desire and The Sacred Romance

The idea that the irrational components of the human mind are productive and even essential if and only if they are in complete submission to the rational mind originates from Plato, and especially the Republic. I make no apology as a Christian for the influence of Plato upon my thinking as Platonic thought also seems to have influenced the New Testament's use of langauge. Notably, the Platonists were the first to associate the Greek word λογος (logos) with God.

Other than that I hope that the paper pretty much speaks for itself. Hope someone somewhere is crazy enough to enjoy it!

Posted by Kenny at July 27, 2004 8:38 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog.kennypearce.net/admin/mt-tb.cgi/37
"Feminism is Demeaning to Women:" Some Remarks on Christianity, Feminism, and Gender Roles
Excerpt: I recently asserted parenthetically, without any real explanation, that "I think feminism is demeaning to women." I also referred to "this 'Christian feminism' crap." Well, I finally succeeded in generating some contentious dialog, which has motivated ...
Weblog: blog.kennypearce.net
Tracked: January 26, 2005 11:23 PM


Minor edits made today.

Posted by: Kenny Pearce at May 10, 2005 3:21 PM

Edits made today. In particular, there was a change of terminology to say "non-rational impulse" instead of "irrational impulse," since I do not think that this impulse is contrary to rationality, but simply not part of it. A few brief statements about gender roles were also removed because (a) they were unnecessary to the broader discussion, and (b) I'm no longer sure I believe them.

Posted by: Kenny at June 22, 2006 10:54 PM

Post a comment

Return to blog.kennypearce.net