October 2, 2009

This Post is Old!

The post you are reading is years old and may not represent my current views. I started blogging around the time I first began to study philosophy, age 17. In my view, the point of philosophy is to expose our beliefs to rational scrutiny so we can revise them and get better beliefs that are more likely to be true. That's what I've been up to all these years, and this blog has been part of that process. For my latest thoughts, please see the front page.

Quote of the Day: Leibniz Against Hyper-Calvinism

If there are people who believe that election and reprobation are accomplished on God's part by a despotic and absolute power, not only without any apparent reason but actually without any reason, even a concealed one, they maintain an opinion that destroys alike the nature of things and the divine perfections. Such an absolutely absolute decree (so to speak) would be without doubt insupportable. But Luther and Calvin were far from such a belief: the former hopes that the life to come will make us comprehend the just reasons of God's choice; and the latter protests explicitly that these reasons are just and holy, although they be unknown to us. I have already in that connexion quoted Calvin's treatise on predestination, and here are the actual words: 'God before the fall of Adam had reflected upon what he had to do, and that for causes concealed from us. ... It is evident therefore that he had just causes for the reprobation of some of mankind, but causes to us UNKNOWN' (Leibniz, Theodicy, tr. E. M. Huggard, sect. 338; emphases and ellipsis original).

Leibniz does not give a more specific citation for the Calvin quote, and the edition I have doesn't have much in the way of editor's notes. Leibniz is evidently anticipating a (hyper-)Calvinist objection to his claim that "the wise mind always acts according to principles; always according to rules, and never according to exceptions" (Theod. 337). This, Leibniz insists, need not be understood as in any way undermining the Protestant understanding of the doctrine of election.

Posted by Kenny at October 2, 2009 5:01 PM
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog.kennypearce.net/admin/mt-tb.cgi/516
Soteriological Inclusivism
Excerpt: Jeremy has an interesting discussion of soteriological inclusivism up on his blog. He argues, without necessarily endorsing inclusivism, that this view can be best accommodated by a Calvinist understanding of salvation. I want here to first clarify how...
Weblog: blog.kennypearce.net
Tracked: February 3, 2010 5:29 PM
eb en vloed kortingscoupon
Excerpt: kortingscoupon voor de eb en vloed winkel
Weblog: kortingscoupon eb en vloed
Tracked: October 19, 2011 5:50 AM

Post a comment





Return to blog.kennypearce.net