February 3, 2014
Why Do We Ask Why?
Several of the essays in The Puzzle of Existence argue, in one way or another, that no non-trivial answer can be given to those who ask why there is something rather than nothing. This may be because the question is somehow confused or mistaken, as in the case of Ross who argues that there is no such entity as everything (the totality of contingent concrete things, the Cosmos, etc.), and hence there can be no explaining the existence of everything. Or it may be because the Principle of Sufficient Reason is false, and so not every legitimate why question has...
Continue reading "Why Do We Ask Why?"
Topic(s):
Aristotle
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Cosmological Argument
,
Elizabeth Anscombe
,
Existence of God
,
Historical Thinkers
,
Historiography of Philosophy
,
Jacob Ross
,
John Heil
,
Laws of Nature
,
Metaphysics
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Shieva Kleinschmidt
,
Tyron Goldschmidt
Posted by
Kenny at
5:55 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (0)
January 6, 2014
Christopher Hughes on Contingency and Plurality
According to Christopher Hughes, arguments from contingency for the existence of a necessary being are standardly held to depend on two crucial assumptions: a contingency-dependence principle (which may be thought to derive from the Principle of Sufficient Reason), and the existence of a sufficiently inclusive being. The burden of Hughes's contribution to The Puzzle of Existence is to argue that the second assumption can be dispensed with. Let's start by seeing what these two assumptions are, and how they fit into standard arguments. A contingency-dependence principle states that any contingent entity must depend for its existence on some entity outside...
Continue reading "Christopher Hughes on Contingency and Plurality"
Topic(s):
Christopher Hughes
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Cosmological Argument
,
Existence of God
,
George Boolos
,
Jacob Ross
,
Metaphysics
,
Modality
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Tyron Goldschmidt
Posted by
Kenny at
4:01 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (0)
December 20, 2013
Jacob Ross on the PSR
Leibniz famously claimed that, once we have endorsed the Principle of Sufficient Reason, "the first questions we will be entitled to put will be - Why does something exist rather than nothing?" The answer to this question, he further claimed, "must needs be outside the sequence of contingent things and must be in a substance which is the cause of this sequence, or which is a necessary being, bearing in itself the reason for its own existence, otherwise we should not yet have a sufficient reason with which to stop" ("Principles of Nature and Grace," sects. 7-8, tr. Latta). In...
Continue reading "Jacob Ross on the PSR"
Topic(s):
Alexander R. Pruss
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Cosmological Argument
,
Existence of God
,
Explanation
,
G. W. Leibniz
,
Historical Thinkers
,
Jacob Ross
,
Metaphysics
,
Modality
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Tyron Goldschmidt
Posted by
Kenny at
7:03 AM
|
Comments (1)
|
TrackBack (1)