February 3, 2014
Why Do We Ask Why?
Several of the essays in The Puzzle of Existence argue, in one way or another, that no non-trivial answer can be given to those who ask why there is something rather than nothing. This may be because the question is somehow confused or mistaken, as in the case of Ross who argues that there is no such entity as everything (the totality of contingent concrete things, the Cosmos, etc.), and hence there can be no explaining the existence of everything. Or it may be because the Principle of Sufficient Reason is false, and so not every legitimate why question has...
Continue reading "Why Do We Ask Why?"
Topic(s):
Aristotle
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Cosmological Argument
,
Elizabeth Anscombe
,
Existence of God
,
Historical Thinkers
,
Historiography of Philosophy
,
Jacob Ross
,
John Heil
,
Laws of Nature
,
Metaphysics
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Shieva Kleinschmidt
,
Tyron Goldschmidt
Posted by
Kenny at
5:55 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (0)
December 15, 2013
Kleinschmidt on the Principle of Sufficient Reason
Philosophers have perhaps more often assumed the Principle of Sufficient Reason than argued for it. Furthermore, this assumption has, in recent years, fallen out of favor due to the PSR's allegedly unacceptable consequences. Recently, however, the PSR has been defended by Alexander Pruss and Michael Della Rocca. Pruss and Della Rocca both argue that (a version of) the PSR is a presupposition of reason. Pruss defends a version of the PSR restricted to contingent truths and consistent with libertarian free will and indeterminism is physics as a presupposition of our scientific and 'commonsense' explanatory practices. Della Rocca argues that the...
Continue reading "Kleinschmidt on the Principle of Sufficient Reason"
Topic(s):
Alexander R. Pruss
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Cosmological Argument
,
Existence of God
,
Metaphysics
,
Michael Della Rocca
,
Modality
,
Ned Markosian
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Philosophy of Science
,
Shieva Kleinschmidt
,
Tyron Goldschmidt
Posted by
Kenny at
6:15 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (1)
December 9, 2013
Oppy on Theism, Naturalism, and Explanation
In his contribution to Goldschmidt's The Puzzle of Existence, Graham Oppy argues that, "as [a] hypothes[i]s about the contents of global causal reality" (p. 51), naturalism is ceteris paribus preferable to theism. Oppy's strategy for defending this claim is to consider three hypotheses about the structure of global causal reality, and argue that naturalism is superior to theism on each hypothesis. Here are his three hypotheses: Regress: Causal reality does not have an initial maximal part. That is, it is not the case that there is a part of causal reality which has no parts that stand in causal relations...
Continue reading "Oppy on Theism, Naturalism, and Explanation"
Topic(s):
Causation
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Cosmological Argument
,
Creation and Conservation
,
Existence of God
,
Graham Oppy
,
Grounding
,
Karen Bennett
,
Metaphysics
,
Modality
,
Philosophical Theology
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Shieva Kleinschmidt
,
Timothy O'Connor
,
Tyron Goldschmidt
Posted by
Kenny at
6:38 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (0)