Descartes, Cudworth, and God
Ren. Cartefius, (though otherwise an Acute Philosopher) was here no less Childish, in affirming, that all things whatsoever, even the Natures of Good and Evil, and all Truth and Falsehood, do so depend upon the Arbitrary Will and Power of God, as that if he had pleased, Twice Two should not have been Four, nor the Three Angles of a Plain Triangle, Equal to Two Right ones, and the like...Than which, no Paradox of any old Philosopher, was ever more Absurd and Irrational: and certainly if any one did desire, to perswade the World, that Cartesius, notwithstanding all his pretences...
Continue reading "Descartes, Cudworth, and God"
An Argument that Divine Knowledge Must be Active
Among the basic assumptions of classical philosophical theology are God's aseity and impassibility. The former is God's attribute of being a se (literally, from Godself) in such a way that God is in no way derived from or dependent on anything else. The latter is God's attribute of being incapable of being acted upon (nothing can do anything to God). In humans, when we know something we believe it because its true, and in the typical case this 'because' is at least partly causal. (This raises notorious problems for, e.g., mathematical knowledge, but never mind that.) If, however, God is...
Continue reading "An Argument that Divine Knowledge Must be Active"
Topic(s):
Aristotle
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Divine Attributes
,
Graham Oppy
,
Historical Thinkers
,
Lucretius
,
Mental Representation
,
Metaphysics
,
Omniscience
,
Philosophical Theology
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Mind
,
Ralph Cudworth
,
Thomas Aquinas
Posted by
Kenny at
8:01 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (0)