Pruss and Rasmussen on the Argument from Necessary Abstracta
Pruss and Rasmussen's seventh chapter puts forward an argument for the existence of a necessary concrete being from the existence of necessary abstracta. They connect this strategy with an argument of Leibniz's. The Leibnizian argument, usually known as the 'argument from necessary truths', is to some extent known in the contemporary literature, but it has not become part of the standard list of arguments for the existence of God. (For instance, it is not discussed in Jordan Howard Sobel's Logic and Theism or Graham Oppy's Arguing About Gods.) Leibniz himself always seems to run through this argument very fast, and...
Continue reading "Pruss and Rasmussen on the Argument from Necessary Abstracta"
Topic(s):
Abstract Objects
,
Alexander R. Pruss
,
Contemporary Thinkers
,
Existence of God
,
G. W. Leibniz
,
Historical Thinkers
,
Joshua L. Rasmussen
,
Metaphysics
,
Modality
,
Ontology
,
Philosophy
,
Philosophy of Religion
,
Truth
Posted by
Kenny at
6:42 PM
|
Comments (0)
|
TrackBack (0)