January 1, 2015
Blog Year 2014It's 2015 already, and as the new year starts it appears to have been more than 2 months since I posted anything here. I did a lot of 'serious' writing in 2014, and this is probably part of the reason why I've done less blog writing - only 29 posts, and most of those in the first three months of the year. (This covers the tail-end of my blogging about The Puzzle of Existence, and also the lull between submission and defense of my dissertation.) Despite the light blogging, traffic is up significantly from last year with nearly 590,000 visits...
Continue reading "Blog Year 2014"
October 20, 2014
"How Berkeley's Gardener Knows his Cherry Tree"I have posted a new draft, "How Berkeley's Gardener Knows his Cherry Tree" to my writings page. As always, comments and criticisms are welcome.
Continue reading ""How Berkeley's Gardener Knows his Cherry Tree""
October 1, 2014
Theisms, Metaphysical and ReligiousBoth in the classical tradition and in recent analytic philosophy, much of philosophical theology is concerned with what we might call metaphysical theism, that is, with the notion of God as a metaphysical theory which explains certain facts about the world. This is most visible in the cosmological argument for contingency, where the ability of the theistic hypothesis to explain something that (allegedly) cannot be explained (or explained equally well) without God is given as a reason for belief in God. A lot of our theorizing about God (in this metaphysical mode) then has to do with the question of...
Continue reading "Theisms, Metaphysical and Religious"
September 1, 2014
"Arnauld's Verbal Distinction Between Ideas and Perceptions"I have posted a new draft, "Arnauld's Verbal Distinction Between Ideas and Perceptions" to my writings page. Comments are welcome!
Continue reading ""Arnauld's Verbal Distinction Between Ideas and Perceptions""
July 25, 2014
Regarding All Those Possible ArnauldsOne of the main topics of the Leibniz-Arnauld correspondence is the question how, on Leibniz's theory, it can be true that Arnauld might have had children and been a physician rather than being a celibate theologian (see Arnauld's letter of May 13, 1686). One of the curious things that happens in this discussion is that both Leibniz and Arnauld start talking about the many Adams and many Judases and many Arnaulds in the various possible worlds, with Leibniz insisting that none of them is identical to the actual Adam/Judas/Arnauld. In that May 13 letter, Arnauld even speaks of 'several mes',...
Continue reading "Regarding All Those Possible Arnaulds"
July 12, 2014
"Berkeley's Lockean Religious Epistemology" in JHIMy paper "Berkeley's Lockean Religious Epistemology" has now (finally!) appeared in Journal of the History of Ideas! In accord with the journal's self-archival policy, I have removed the online preprint I had posted; apologies to those without subscriptions. I will put the official version of the paper up after the one year embargo has expired.
Continue reading ""Berkeley's Lockean Religious Epistemology" in JHI"
May 12, 2014
Philosophers' Carnival 163The latest Philosophers' Carnival is up at The Indian Philosophy Blog, with a link to my post on divine deception.
Continue reading "Philosophers' Carnival 163"
April 29, 2014
A Supreme Court Paradox!In the current version of the Supreme Court decision Octane Fitness v. Icon Health & Fitness up at Cornell's Legal Information Institute, footnote 1 reads "Justice Scalia joins this opinion except as to footnotes 1-3." This is not quite a Liar Paradox, but close. Whether the view attributed to Scalia is consistent depends on some interpretive questions: does Scalia merely refrain from affirming the content of footnotes 1-3, or does he actively reject them? Does he reject each of the footnotes individually, or only the conjunction of them? If he actively rejects each of footnotes 1-3 individually, then which part...
Continue reading "A Supreme Court Paradox!"
April 23, 2014
Hudson on Skeptical Theism and Divine DeceptionThe forthcoming Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion is full of interesting stuff! So far, I specially recommend Bishop and Perszyk on alternative conceptions of God and Dougherty and Pruss on apparently unjustified evils as 'anomalies' (in the philosophy of science sense). I have not yet read the last four articles. Here, I want to comment on Hud Hudson's "The Father of Lies?" (This post got longer than I intended, so I've added sub-headings. If you get bored in the middle, please skip to the end. I've also bolded important parts to make for easier skimming.) Hudson's Argument Hudson's central...
Continue reading "Hudson on Skeptical Theism and Divine Deception"
Topic(s): Alexander R. Pruss , Divine Revelation , Epistemology , Faith , George Berkeley , Historical Thinkers , Hud Hudson , John Locke , Lara Buchak , Miracles , Philosophy , Philosophy of Religion , Skeptical Theism , The Problem of Evil
Posted by Kenny at 10:25 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by Kenny at 10:25 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
March 26, 2014
"Leibniz and the Veridicality of Body Perceptions"A new draft, "Leibniz on Phenomenalism, Mechanism, and the Great Chain of Being", has been posted to my writings page. Comments are welcome, as always!
Continue reading ""Leibniz and the Veridicality of Body Perceptions""
March 21, 2014
Dissertation Defended!You may call me 'doctor' now.
Continue reading "Dissertation Defended!"
March 19, 2014
Quote of the Day: Bayle on the Skeptical Consequences of Multi-Location[If multi-location is possible] it follows that neither you nor I can be certain whether we are distinct from other men, or whether we are at this moment in the seraglio of Constantinople, in Canada, in Japan, and in every city of the world, under different conditions in each place. Since God does nothing in vain, would he create many men when one, created in various places and possessing different qualities according to the places, would suffice?
- Pierre Bayle, Historical and Critical Dictionary (1697), tr. Popkin, s.v. "Pyrrho," note B
Continue reading "Quote of the Day: Bayle on the Skeptical Consequences of Multi-Location"
March 18, 2014
Review of The Puzzle of ExistenceMy review of The Puzzle of Existence is now up on my writings page. Comments welcome.
Continue reading "Review of The Puzzle of Existence"
March 10, 2014
The Puzzle of Existence: Concluding Thoughts and Table of PostsI have now completed my series of posts on The Puzzle of Existence. I'll conclude by saying that I enjoyed most of the essays in this book quite a lot, and found them interesting food for thought. Further reflection on the points raised by the various authors stands to enrich metaphysics, philosophy of religion, and the theory of explanation. Additionally, most of the essays are quite accessible for non-specialists, including advanced undergraduate students. Assuming that a less expensive paperback version becomes available, this book would be a great choice for graduate or advanced undergraduate courses covering explanation in metaphysics, the...
Continue reading "The Puzzle of Existence: Concluding Thoughts and Table of Posts"
March 6, 2014
McDaniel's Ontological Pluralism and the Puzzle of ExistenceThe very last essay in The Puzzle of Existence is the article by Kris McDaniel which examines the bearing of ontological pluralism on the question, why is there something rather than nothing? Ontological pluralism, as McDaniel uses that term, is the thesis that there is more than one kind of being, existence, or reality. (McDaniel usually prefers the term 'being,' but seems to use 'existence' and 'reality' as synonyms.) This is not simply the trivial thesis that there are many different kinds of beings (i.e., that there are things of many different kinds), and it is not a metaphysically deflationary...
Continue reading "McDaniel's Ontological Pluralism and the Puzzle of Existence"