March 17, 2007

The Historicity of the Doctrine of Inerrancy

Jeremy Pierce of Parableman has an excellent post refuting the claim that the doctrine of inerrancy was invented in the 19th century as a response to theological liberals. I intend someday to get back to my long-stalled Why Believe the Bible? series, and when I do some of what Jeremy says here will be important for the next post, which is supposed to be on the witness of the Church to the Scripture. My one complaint about this post is that, in a fashion that is unfortunately typical of my fellow Protestants, it jumps through Church history from the New Testament, to Augustine, to Luther and Calvin, as though there was nothing in between. To remedy that briefly, let me add a few additional quotations (these are from David W. Bercot's book, A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs):

"These were men who declared things about God and the things of God. They were guided by the Spirit of God ... It would be irrational for us to disbelieve the Spirit from God and to give heed to mere human opinions. For He moved the mouths of the prophets like musical instruments." - Athenagoras 2.132

"I could produce ten thousand Scriptures of which not 'one tittle will pass away' without being fulfilled. For the mouth of the Lord, the Holy Spirit, has spoken these things." - Clement of Alexandria, 2.195

"These fathers were furnished with the Spirit, and they were largely honored by the Word Himself. They were similar to instruments of music. For they had the Word always in union with them ... When moved by Him, the prophets spoke what God willed. For they did not speak of their own power. Let there be no mistake about that. Nor did they speak the things that pleased themselves." - Hippolytus, 5.204

"Either [heretics] do not believe that the divine Scriptures were dictated by the Holy Spirit (and are thus infidels), or else they think that they themselves are wiser than the Holy Spirit (which makes them demoniacs)." - Eusebius, quoting Caius, 5.602 [An editorial note is in order on just how strong this claim is - Caius is claiming (1) that thinking anything in the Scripture does not record what God believes to be true is tantamount to denying the doctrine of inspiration, and (2) that anyone who denies the doctrine of inspiration is an 'infidel.']

Of course, these brief quotes don't prove that these are precisely the detailed, considered views of these people, but they certainly contribute usefully to the cumulative case that the doctrine of inerrancy has been around from a very early point in Church history.

Posted by kpearce at March 17, 2007 01:51 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Post a comment
If you have never commented on this blog with your email address before, or if you choose not to enter an email address, please note that typing any links or URLs, including in the URL box below, will probably result in your comment being marked as spam. If, after posting, you see a page explaining the the spam filter didn't like your comment, please email to ensure that your comment is approved. Thank you.

Remember personal info?

Return to
Philosophy Blogs - Blog Top Sites