August 3, 2006

This Post is Old!

The post you are reading is years old and may not represent my current views. I started blogging around the time I first began to study philosophy, age 17. In my view, the point of philosophy is to expose our beliefs to rational scrutiny so we can revise them and get better beliefs that are more likely to be true. That's what I've been up to all these years, and this blog has been part of that process. For my latest thoughts, please see the front page.

Regulating the Internet Won't Increase Competition

Policy analyst Timothy B. Lee writes in an op-ed in today's New York Times that

It�s tempting to believe that government regulation of the Internet would be more consumer-friendly; history and economics suggest otherwise. The reason is simple: a regulated industry has a far larger stake in regulatory decisions than any other group in society. As a result, regulated companies spend lavishly on lobbyists and lawyers and, over time, turn the regulatory process to their advantage.

Economists have dubbed this process �regulatory capture,� and they can point to plenty of examples.

Governments very rarely prevent monopolies, trusts, or cartels from forming - far more often they create them. We mustn't let the internet become yet another example of this. The market forces are sufficient to solve most of the existing problems (I would say: all the problems except those that previous government regulation created). More regulation will only make things worse.

Posted by Kenny at August 3, 2006 6:41 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:


Here comes again the government.With all those regulations they have made? What for? I think they really do have big eyes on something that there is money revolving in the net.

Stanley Lee from Coupe faim puissant 

Posted by: Stanley Lee at December 9, 2011 6:45 AM

Post a comment

Return to